Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Polkadot logo

The First Polkadot Vote…

A vote has been started that will alter the course of Polkadot and define the final denomination of its native DOT token. It affects all Polkadot stakeholders. If you have claimed your DOT on the mainnet, or you plan to, then you can — and should! — vote.

By Dr. Gavin WoodJuly 13, 2020

A vote has been started that will alter the course of Polkadot and define the final denomination of its native DOT token. It affects all Polkadot stakeholders. If you have claimed your DOT on the mainnet, or you plan to, then you can — and should! — vote.

Two months ago, a vote was conducted on Polkadot’s “wild cousin” network, Kusama. The vote was over a simple, non-binding declaration that the assembled Kusama community be in favor of changing the denomination of the “DOT” token, essentially multiplying all balances across the system by one hundred. The result was a resounding “yes”, albeit with a sizable minority contingent against it, and voices questioning why it should be 100 and not 10 or 1000.

Although there was clearly a large degree of support for it, the Web3 Foundation decided that the voting population of Kusama might reasonably be sufficiently different to that of Polkadot that the results could not be blindly enacted. That said, the Foundation undertook to do further research and, if reasonable, reconduct the vote on Polkadot with real DOT tokens.

Research

The Foundation reached out to a wide variety of community members and Polkadot stakeholders to determine potential practical issues regarding a redenomination. This included prospective token ecosystem stakeholders such as exchanges as well as established community leaders. The outcome was fairly simple;

  • Infrastructure providers were generally sanguine about practical issues concerning a redenomination after launch and supported the effort, though (obviously) would prefer for it to happen before launch or hours within launch to minimize their own workload and risk.
  • Community leaders indicated that some community stakeholders may have some degree of reliance on the DOT denomination remaining unchanged from the 2017 sale lest the meaning of what constitutes a “DOT” be misunderstood.

Our preference would have been to make a vote on the denomination whose outcome was, more or less, instantly enacted and done before transferability. Unfortunately, our research indicated that this may cause some substantial problems within the Polkadot community.

Three options were considered:

  1. Keep DOT the same and introduce a new name (e.g. XPD) for the new denomination and encourage all to use the new denomination instead. This has the disadvantage of losing the “DOT” name.
  2. Try to distinguish the old DOT from the new DOT with some sort of “year” naming system — DOT2017 vs DOT2020. It is unclear that this would actually provide enough clarity to avoid any problems.
  3. Provide a “grace period” after transfers are enabled, to avoid any confusion or ambiguity on Day 1 regarding the original DOT denomination. This means switching the denomination while the system is fully “live”.

After a long period of discussions, the Foundation decided that the only option it could reasonably back was option 3.

Proposal

In the next days, we will begin a final, “binding” vote on the redenomination. We encourage all members of the community to discuss and put forth their views (politely!).

In the interests of simplicity and accessibility, a single poll will happen. Four options will be provided and may be voted upon via the Polkadot.js user interface as well as any wallets that build in support. The poll is open now and will last for two weeks. All DOT holders will be able to take part.

The poll will be a simple approval vote with four options. Important notes:

  • Any combination of the four options may be approved of by the voter. There is no need to select only one option!
  • Approving of all or none of the options is equivalent and will not affect the outcome.
  • All voters may alter their votes any number of times prior to the close of the poll.
  • Voting costs nothing other than the transaction fee and can be done from all accounts with a non-zero spendable balance. (If you managed to lock up all of your funds in staking to the point that none is left for transacting and you would like to vote, please contact a representative of the Web3 Foundation.)
  • Locked funds (e.g. for staking) are counted.
  • No discretionary lock-voting is in place; all DOT used to vote counts the same.
  • Voting is made on a per-account basis; a single account must all vote the same way and cannot split its vote.
  • This vote does not affect any economics of the Polkadot platform. Staking rewards, inflation, effective market capitalization and the underlying balances of every account remain completely unchanged. It is “merely” about what units we use to denominate the balances into “DOT” for the purpose of display.

From 43,200 blocks (approximately 72 hours) after DOT tokens become transferable, the DOT token shall be denominated according to whichever option received the most approvals. The grace period was chosen as the optimal time that was acceptable across ecosystem stakeholders.

The four options being polled are:

  • No change from the original 2017 sale definitions; will mean a total of 10m DOT from genesis.
  • Split of 10x from the original sale; will mean a total of 100m DOT from genesis. Apparent DOT price would be 10x lower.
  • Split of 100x from the original sale; will mean a total of 1b DOT from genesis. Apparent DOT price would be 100x lower.
  • Split of 1,000x from the original sale; will mean a total of 10b DOT from genesis. Apparent DOT price would be 1000x lower.

If we take the original 2017 sale price of $32/DOT, then these four options would result in an equivalent price of $32 (no change), $3.20, $0.32 and $0.032 respectively.

Any change will happen entirely off-chain, exclusively at the user-interface layer, since the chain logic only tracks the underlying balance in Plank units (Polkadot’s lowest denomination), and doesn’t care about the denomination that is displayed. The Foundation will give further updates on anything for community stakeholders to be aware of should this happen, technical information &c.

Head over to Riot to chat about this proposed change. Head to Polkadot JS Apps, for claiming and voting. More information on Polkadot can be found on its website. The latest v0.8 client release may be found on the GitHub releases page.

From the blog

Polkadot Ecosystem Ignites 2025: A Year of Unprecedented Decentralization, DeFi Breakthroughs, and Global Builder Momentum

A quarter-by-quarter recap of Polkadot’s 2025 milestones, from record-breaking decentralization and DeFi growth to Polkadot 2.0 and global builder momentum.

Proof of Personhood: How Polkadot proves you're real without KYC

Proof of personhood lets you prove you're a unique human without giving up privacy. Polkadot's Project Individuality uses tattoos and video games to fight bots and enable fair airdrops for millions.

Pudgy Party: The Web3 game that hides the blockchain

Pudgy Party hit 900,000 downloads in six weeks by hiding the blockchain entirely. Built on Mythos Chain, players get custodial wallets and zero gas fees without realizing it. The game proves Web3 gaming works when blockchain infrastructure becomes invisible.

Polkadot at TechCrunch Disrupt 2025: The only blockchain in the room

Polkadot showed up at TechCrunch Disrupt 2025 as the only blockchain sponsor. With nearly 10,000 booth visitors and strong coordination across ecosystem teams, the event proved valuable for positioning Polkadot in Web2 conversations.

Why most blockchains can't handle AI (and what changes that)

Most blockchains can't handle AI's computational demands. High costs, limited speed, and storage constraints require purpose-built modular infrastructure instead.

Onboarding 21,000 users with Nova Shots: What we learned & how we move forward

How do you bring thousands of esports fans onchain without asking them to buy anything first? At three BLAST Counter-Strike events, Nova Wallet onboarded 21,000 new users through free interactive gameplay, processing 2.8 million transfers on Polkadot.

Meet the first cohort: The 5 teams selected for the DeFi Builders Program

Velocity Labs announces 5 teams selected for the DeFi Builders Program Cohort 1, building innovative financial applications on Polkadot Hub.

5 tech outages that prove decentralization can't wait

From AWS to CrowdStrike, major outages are increasing. Discover why centralized infrastructure keeps failing and how decentralization offers a solution.

Real World Assets on Polkadot: Your comprehensive guide to RWA

Real-World Assets bring physical value onto blockchain. Learn what RWAs are, how tokenization works, and why Polkadot is best for RWA projects.

Q3 2025 Polkadot DAO recap: Supply cap, treasury decisions & what's next

Here's what happened in Polkadot governance during Q3 2025: a permanent supply cap, millions in treasury funding decisions, and notable proposal rejections that exposed growing pains in how the DAO evaluates non-technical work.

Building AI on Polkadot: Why centralized compute is the wrong foundation

Build AI on Polkadot with verifiable data, cryptographic privacy, and native interoperability. 90% cost savings, no vendor lock-in, production-ready.

What Does Web3 Music Success Actually Look Like?

The Decentralized Mic brought together builders and investors actively shaping the future of Web3 music to discuss what's working, what's broken, and where the industry is headed next.

xs